CIA Analysis on Benghazi
Posted by madjillmom on April 2, 2014
Why would the CIA have their analysts put forward a (false) reason for the attack in Benghazi without actually talking to those present in Libya and Benghazi? I think we know why the CIA doesn’t seem to catch much out there in the world these days. It is all analysts and not much from the field. Field work would seem to be essential in figuring out the situation. Former Deputy Sec. Morell seemed to act as the brick wall between human intelligence and the analysts in the sub basement at Langley. This still doesn’t explain Obama continuing the falsity up to two weeks later. That is on Obama. The lie served the campaign.
This entry was posted on April 2, 2014 at 5:54 pm and is filed under Obama Administration, Pres. Barack Obama. Tagged: Benghazi, Benghazi Talking Points, CIA Analyists, Death of American Ambassador, Hillary Clinton, Libya. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Mama Bin Cranky 
OGRE said
It’s a reflection of big business. The people at the top are brain washed to think that there are people that “do that for us”. Meaning that they have people that analyze the data and bring back somehow better information than eye-witness accounts!
The same thing happens in the corporate world. There are people that convince their uppers that they have a better grasp on what happens than those who are actually there!